The latest US-led strike in Venezuela and the detention of its leader have ignited unease regarding Washington's designs on the Arctic territory. Followers of the ex-president's political movement have allegedly focused on the strategically important landmass in the wake of the operations in the southern hemisphere.
Merely hours following the start of the Venezuelan campaign, a well-known right-wing podcaster, who is married to a high-ranking White House aide, posted a symbolic image. The picture showed Greenland covered in the stars and stripes, with the cryptic caption: "SOON."
This overt threat to absorb the resource-abundant region, which is a member of the NATO alliance, triggered immediate and strong condemnation from Danish officials.
"We are strong partners and should keep work together as such. US security is also Greenland’s and Denmark’s security," declared the Danish ambassador to the United States. "The Kingdom of Denmark and the US collaborate to ensure security in the Arctic."
The ambassador additionally pointed out that the kingdom had significantly boosted its defence spending recently, earmarking a substantial sum expressly for Northern and regional defence. "And yes, we expect full recognition for the sovereign borders of the Kingdom of Denmark," he emphasized.
The situation were additionally exacerbated by the previous appointment of a US state governor as a representative to Greenland. The appointee had publicly thanked the commander-in-chief, stating it was an "honour" to serve in a volunteer capacity to "make Greenland a part of the US."
Following the events in Venezuela, this representative praised the president's decisive move, connecting it to the wider "war on drugs."
Ever since returning to office, the American leader has consistently alarmed transatlantic allies with his stated interest in Greenland. The territory is viewed as vitally important for defence and future resource extraction. It currently houses the northernmost US air base.
In a notable media appearance, the leader refused to exclude the use of military force to acquire Greenland. This stance comes during intensifying great-power rivalry in the Arctic. "I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything... We need Greenland very badly," he remarked.
He characterized Greenland as having a "tiny amount of people, which we’ll take care of, and we’ll cherish them... But we need that for international security."
In response to this persistent "rhetoric" of threats, Danish intelligence service took the extraordinary step last month of classifying the United States as a "security risk."
The leaders of both Greenland issued a unified and stern rebuke: "We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again... You cannot annex other countries."
Surveys in Greenland shows a nuanced sentiment. While a vast majority of the territory's residents desire self-rule from Copenhagen, there is simultaneously little to no appetite to become part of the United States. The island has had the legal right to declare sovereignty for over a decade.
Military analysts are now reconsidering the likelihood of such a move. One thinktank director focusing in military analysis admitted she had previously dismissed the sabre-rattling but was "currently not so sure."
"Logistically, it would be feasible for the US to station a few hundred or a couple thousand troops inside of Greenland, and it's not clear to me which power could do anything about it," she observed.
Elena Rossi is a cloud technology expert with over a decade of experience in data security and digital transformation strategies.